The enemy entered the field with great calculations, but the reality of Iran upset their equations one by one. Today, even in their think tanks, there is a discussion about finding a “turnaround.”

1. They thought that by eliminating the Leader of the Revolution, the pillar of the country’s tent would collapse; but they saw that the nation stood firm and a deep-rooted structure would not allow collapse.

2. They had imagined a three-day war; but Iran stood firm and from the very first days, they realized that they had entered a field whose end was not in their control.

3. They wanted to shake the country’s defensive pillars by assassinating the commanders; but the command was rebuilt faster than they imagined and the responses continued to be heavier.

4. They thought that the streets would be on fire at the same time as the war; but the people stood firm and this scenario collapsed before it could take shape.

5. They wanted to deepen social polarization by inducing fear for one group and courage for another; but the war awakened the sense of defending the homeland.

6. They dreamed of dividing some regions of the country; but the timely presence of the military buried this dream at the very beginning.

7. They thought that the resistance front was tired and weakened; but the field responses of Iraq, Hezbollah, and Yemen surprised them.

8. They thought that by attacking police stations, the security of the cities would collapse; but timely planning caused only empty buildings to be demolished and the security of the people to be maintained.

9. They wanted to create a narrative of victory through a media war; but the reality of the field was so clear that many of these claims collapsed.

10. They thought that Iran's missile capabilities were limited; but in the field, they were confronted with new weapons and new methods that they were nailed.

11. They thought that Iran's missile stockpile would run out soon; But the continuation of the responses showed that Iran was ready for a long battle.

12. They thought they could portray the war as a mere conflict with the government; but when hospitals and people's homes were targeted and the blood of innocent students spilled on the ground, this deception collapsed

13. They hoped that the country's economy would collapse and the service delivery system would be disrupted; but the market and the provision of people's needs and the service delivery process continued.

14. They expected internal political divisions to deepen; but many currents stood together against foreign aggression.

15. They thought that Iran would be isolated in the world; but Iran's voice was heard in many forums.

16. They thought that a grand coalition would be formed against Iran; but such a consensus never emerged.

17. They hoped that the countries of the region would side with them; but many of them distanced themselves from the spread of the war.

18. They sought to disrupt the country's management with sabotage and cyber attacks; but the resilience of the structures also thwarted this plan.

19. They thought they could downplay the international economic effects; but the reaction of global markets showed that the crisis could not be easily hidden.

20. They thought that Iran would become confused in difficult moments such as the removal of the leadership; but timely decisions and anticipated structures such as experts showed that the regime of the governor was ready for difficult days.